DOJ Announces Settlement With Georgia Employer Over Immigration-Related Discriminatory Employment Practices

On March 25, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it had a reached a settlement agreement with Poulan Pecan, a pecan supplier based in Poulan, Georgia, to resolve allegations that the company violated the anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The department’s investigation, which started with a hotline referral, concluded that Poulan Pecan discriminated against work-authorized non-U.S. citizens by requiring them to present specific and additional documents as proof of identity and work authorization during the Form I-9 verification process. According to the department’s investigation, the company did not impose similar requirements on U.S. citizens, thereby violating the anti-discrimination provision of the INA.

Under the terms of the settlement, Poulan Pecan will pay $500 in civil penalties and be subject to monitoring of its employment eligibility verification procedure for one year. In addition, certain company employees underwent DOJ training about the anti-discrimination provision of the INA prior to the announcement of the agreement.

USCIS Issues Correction to Instructions Regarding Effective Date for New Version of Form I-9

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has confirmed that the effective date for mandatory use of the new Form I-9 (Form I-9 (Rev. 03/08/13)N) is May 7, 2013. The USCIS’ announcement resolves apparent discrepancies in previously issued guidance that led some employers to question if the effective date for implementing the new Form I-9 was May 7, 2013 or May 8, 2013. The corrected guidance was issued in the Federal Register on April 9, 2013.

USCIS Introduces the New Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification Form

USCIS Introduces the New Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification Form

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the release of the revised Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification Form, available for use beginning March 8, 2013. The updated version of the form “(Rev. 03/08/13) N” replaces prior versions ((Rev. 02/02/09) N and (Rev. 08/07/09) Y), which may no longer be used by the public as of May 7, 2013. Employers must use the Form I-9 to verify the identity and employment eligibility of all new employees hired after November 6, 1986.

The newly revised Form I-9 features additional data requests, including fields for foreign passport information, telephone numbers and email addresses, updated instructions and, most importantly, an expanded format from one page to two. The new two-page layout does not include the List of Acceptable Documents and form instructions. According to the new format, employees will be required to complete Page 1 of the form while employers will complete Page 2.

According to the USCIS, employers should begin using the new version of the Form I-9 immediately but will be granted a 60-day grace period to implement the change. After May 7, 2013, employers who fail to use the revised Form I-9 may be subject to penalties under Section 274(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as enforced by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Employers should follow the instructions found on the new Form I-9 until the release of the revised M-274, Handbook for Employers, which is being updated to conform to the new form.

To download a copy of the new Form I-9 and corresponding instructions, please click here. For additional information about Form I-9 compliance, please contact your GT Attorney.

UPDATE: The USCIS has released a new version of the M-274, Handbook for Employers. This coincides with last week’s announcement that employers should begin using the updated version of the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, which was revised on March 8, 2013. To access the new M-274, please click here.

ICE Audits and Fines Reach All-Time High in 2012

According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a record number of companies faced Form I-9 inspections in 2012, resulting in the audit of more than 3,000 employers in 2012 alone. Concurrently, recently released ICE data shows that fines levied by the agency totaled almost $13 million between fiscal 2009 to 2012, with the number of company managers arrested reaching 238.

According to ICE, the bolstered enforcement effort, which entails comparing payroll records and information found on Forms I-9 with employees’ data in government databases, emphasizes “compliance and deterrence.” According to Brian Bench, Special Agent in Charge of ICE’s Seattle, Wash., office, “[I]f companies know we're out there, looking across the board, they're more likely to bring themselves into compliance."

USCIS Issues New Guidance for Form I-9 and E-Verify Procedures Under DACA

Responding to corporate concerns about the introduction of the federal government’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (DACA), the USCIS has released updated guidance to assist employers with implementing compliant Form I-9 and E-Verify procedures for DACA-eligible employees.

According to the new rules, the Form I-9 process for newly hired employees with DACA status is substantively similar to non-DACA scenarios. However, the steps advised for bringing existing employees into Form I-9 and E-Verify compliance are notably different from previously issued guidance, including the choice of completing a new Form I-9 for employees whose Section 1 identity information has changed and re-processing these individuals in E-Verify despite the lack of a rehire.

This apparent shift in guidance underscores the challenge DACA poses to employers and the federal government alike, as adapting immigration compliance standards may run the risk of creating DACA-specific rules that trigger business concern about possible claims of discrimination. For a complete version of USCIS’ new guidance about Form I-9 and E-Verify procedures under DACA, please click here.

ICE Issues $625,000 Fine to New Jersey Company for Form I-9 Violations

Infinite Visions, LLC, a New Jersey-based clothing manufacturer, was recently fined $625,000 for Form I-9 violations discovered during an audit and inspection conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) after receiving an anonymous tip about allegations that the company engaged in unlawful hiring practices.

The government’s audit revealed numerous violations of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and serious deficiencies in the company’s employment records. After receiving a Notice of Intent to Fine, the company reached a final settlement with HSI for $625,000.

Since 2009, HSI has pursued a targeted strategy of investigating employers who are suspected of violating federal immigration law by employing undocumented workers and failing to comply with employment eligibility verification requirements. According to official statistics, HSI has levied a record number of civil and criminal penalties in the last year.

USCIS Announces Correction to Submission Procedure for Public Comments About Proposed Form I-9 Revision

On September 10, USCIS issued a correction to its August 22 notice regarding a 30-day public comment period in connection with revisions to the Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification Form). The correction is re-printed below:

In the [original] 30-day notice, USCIS inadvertently did not indicate that comments in connection with that notice should be directed to the OMB USCIS Desk Officer. USCIS is now correcting this error. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in the 30-day notice published in the Federal Register on August 22, 2012 at 77 FR 50710, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to DHS, and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, USCIS Desk Officer. Comments may be submitted to: DHS, USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy, Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529-2020. Comments may also be submitted to DHS via email at uscisfrcomment@dhs.gov, to the OMB USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile at 202-395-5806 or via email at oira_submission@omb.eop.gov, and via the Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site at http://www.Regulations.gov under e-Docket ID number USCIS-2006-2008.

When submitting comments by email, please make sure to add OMB Control Number 1615-0047 in the subject box.

USCIS Announces 30-Day Extension for Public Comments About Proposed Form I-9 Revision

with Nataliya Binshteyn

In a Federal Register Notice dated August 22, 2012, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it will allow members of the public to submit comments about proposed changes to the Form I-9 for an additional thirty (30) days. Comments will be accepted until September 21, 2012 and may be submitted via mail, e-mail, and the Federal eRulemaking Portal. All submissions must include the agency name and Docket ID, and will be posted in the form received to the Federal eRulemaking Portal.

According to USCIS, the previous 60-day public comment period for the new Form I-9 elicited over 6,200 comments.

For a copy of the Federal Register Notice announcing this extension, please click here.

ICE Releases Form I-9 Investigation Fact Sheet

with Laura Foote Reiff

On August 1, 2012, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) released a fact sheet -- “Fact Sheet: Form I-9 Inspection Overview” -- detailing the Form I-9 audit process and employer penalties for violations of federal immigration law in the worksite enforcement arena.

USCIS Announces Continuing Validity of Current Form I-9 Version for Employment Eligibility Verification

On August 13, USCIS announced that employers should continue using the Form I-9 currently available in the forms section of www.uscis.gov until further notice. The current version of the form should continue to be used even after the OMB control number expiration date of August 31, 2012, has passed. USCIS will provide updated information about the new version of the Form I-9 as it becomes available.

Employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the United States.

I-9s and EB-5s: What's the Connection?

Federal immigration laws require employers to verify the identity and work eligibility of their new hires by completing what is known as a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, for every employee. Forms I-9 must be completed for every new hire within his/her first three days of employment. During the I-9 process, employees must present to the individual completing the I-9 (such as human resources personnel) documents to verify their identity and to prove that they have authorization to work in the United States.

The Form I-9 provides three categories of documents that must be presented in order to complete the verification. The new hire must submit either:

  • One “List A” document which establishes BOTH their identity and work authorization in the U.S. List A documents can include a U.S. passport, green card or Employment Authorization Document (EAD) issued by the USCIS
  • One "List B" document that establishes the new hire's identity such as a driver’s license or a military ID card AND one "List C" document which establishes work authorization in the U.S. such as a Social Security Number card or a U.S. birth certificate

Employers charged with verifying employees' status in the U.S. for I-9 purposes are only required to determine whether the documents presented to them reasonably appear to be valid and belong to the individual who submits them. If the employer believes that the documentation presented to them is acceptable, then they do not have to take other measures to verify the employee’s work eligibility and identity. In fact, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has repeatedly cautioned employers against “pre-screening” applicants or over-documenting on the Form I-9, as it is considered to be discriminatory.

Continue Reading

Electronic Form I-9 Software and Due Diligence in a Post-Rose Acre Farms World

The government’s recently filed lawsuit against Rose Acre Farms, a large U.S. egg producer, for discriminatory document practices arising from the company’s use of nowHIRE, an electronic I-9 program, underscores the pitfalls of using electronic I-9 software without the benefit of rigorous due diligence.

According to the government’s complaint, nowHIRE prompted prospective non-citizen employees to produce additional or specific documents in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act’s anti-discrimination provisions. The case brings into sharp relief the Office of Special Counsel’s (OSC) increased scrutiny toward electronic Form I-9 systems that attempt to simplify the Form I-9 completion process, as well as the potential liabilities faced by employers who disproportionately rely on these programs to satisfy immigration compliance obligations.

Although electronic Form I-9 programs can be a useful tool in employers’ overall immigration compliance process, companies would do well to do their own due diligence by partnering with experienced immigration counsel and obtaining vendor indemnification for any errors caused by electronic Form I-9 software. In addition, companies who wish to stay ahead of the liability curve should avoid over-reliance on the perceived compliance of electronic Form I-9 software and ask detailed questions about the product’s features, compliance tools and expert input, as well as its training, security and functionality components. Importantly, employers should also tailor their choice of electronic Form I-9 software, as well as the decision to automate their Form I-9 process at all, to company-specific needs, budgets and workforce characteristics such as size and geography.

DOJ Office of Special Counsel Files Lawsuit Against Indiana Egg Producer for Discriminatory Hiring Practices Related to Document Abuse and Electronic I-9 System

On June 19, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the filing of a lawsuit against Rose Acre Farms, Inc., an Indiana-based egg producer with more than 40 locations in six states, alleging that the company engaged in discriminatory practices against work-authorized non-citizens during the employment eligibility verification process by requiring newly hired non-U.S. citizens to present additional, specific, and/or different documents to verify their employment eligibility. The anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) prohibits employers from committing document abuse during the employment eligibility verification process based on employees’ citizenship status or national origin. Instead, employees must be permitted to present a choice of documents from the approved list of acceptable documents found with the Form I-9.

The complaint alleges that the company purchased nowHIRE, an electronic Form I-9 employment eligibility verification system, that may have caused human resources personnel to request specific documents from non-U.S. citizens. The complaint seeks a court order to prevent future discrimination by the company, as well as changes in the company’s employment eligibility verification policies, monetary damages for affected employees, and civil penalties.

 

U.S. Attorney's Office Charges Texas-Based Firm and Field Operations Supervisor with Harboring and Transporting Illegal Aliens; $10 Million Fine and 100-Year Prison Term at Stake

On May 29, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced the unsealing of a 20-count indictment against GPX/GPX, USA, a Texas-based seismic surveying company, and its field operations supervisor, Douglas C. Wiggill. The indictment charges the company and Wiggill with conspiracy to harbor and transport illegal aliens, as well as the commission of these offenses, for failing to complete Forms I-9 and verify the immigration status of 19 illegal aliens hired to work on a seismic surveying project in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania.

According to the indictment, GPX executed a contractor compliance agreement certifying that its workers were legally authorized to work in the United States despite failing to verify the employment eligibility of the illegal aliens cited in this case, which was jointly investigated by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Williamsport Bureau of Police in Pennsylvania.

Although the 19 employees referenced in the indictment were arrested in June 2011, Wiggill was taken into custody on the day of the indictment’s unsealing. If convicted of all 20 counts, he faces a maximum aggregate sentence of 100 years in prison, a supervised release term of 60 years, a $5 million fine, and a special assessment of $2,000. In addition, GPX stands to receive a total maximum fine of $10 million, a five-year probation term on each count, and a special assessment totaling $8,000.

ICE's Latest Wave of I-9 Audits

On February 17, ICE issued 1,000 Notices of Inspection (NOI) across the country in a firm demonstration of the Obama administration’s ongoing commitment to a worksite enforcement strategy that focuses on employer compliance and much higher administrative fines. We were contacted by employers across the country to help prepare their responses. We were even contacted by an employer who handed their I-9s to the Agents who came to serve the NOI -- no 3 days, no advice by counsel, no waiver explained, no copies, no time, no receipt. What were you thinking, Mr. ICE agent? Not to worry, we worked it out with like adults. 

Seriously those fortunate companies who did not receive a NOI should take advantage of their good fortune and ensure that they are in compliance now. The coast is not clear. One or two additional rounds of audits are expected during this calendar year. This administration has continued to make it clear that the days when immigration compliance could be ignored and considered the “cost of doing business” are long gone. 

ICE is assertively pursuing companies where tips and leads come in,  These administrative reviews have been quite lucrative. It will be very interesting to track this latest round of audits in terms of timing and outcome.

Feel free to write in and share your own experiences.